Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall

8

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The dispute began when the owner's 2005 HSV Coupe GTO Z Series succumbed to flames in March of the previous year. RACQ Insurance accepted the total loss and initially valued the vehicle at $68,000.

However, the unsatisfied owner declined this offer, leading to an independent valuation which described the car as being in “good condition for its age and mileage” despite its 315,000km on the odometer.

Although comparable lower-mileage vehicles were advertised above $81,000, the heavy usage severely reduced its collectible appeal, the independent valuer noted. Conclusively, the evaluator deemed the insurer's offer reasonable.

The car owner contested this, alleging RACQ Insurance's assessment was flawed, particularly regarding the engine type and the car's rarity as one of only 60 manual transmission models, asserting its condition was excellent.

In response, RACQ revised their offer to $78,000 factoring in the vehicle's unique modifications and reconditioned engine, but the claimant stood firm in his refusal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), upon review, sided with the insurer. AFCA deemed RACQ Insurance's valuation and the independent assessment to be “logical, well-considered and helpful.”

According to Glass's Guide referenced by the AFCA, the vehicle's maximum estimated market value could not exceed $58,100, considering its age and mileage. Although rare, evidence was insufficient to justify a $200,000 evaluation.

The AFCA stated, “The complainant has not provided persuasive evidence to demonstrate the vehicle's worth is beyond what the insurer offered. Under such conditions, adjusting the settlement upward would not be justifiable.”

Reference: Original findings from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority's ruling were sourced from RACQ Insurance's appeal letter. Read more about the decision here.

Published:Wednesday, 24th Jul 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Insuregroup's Remarkable Growth Reflects Surge in Truck Insurance Demand

07 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Insuregroup, a specialist insurance brokerage serving Australia's transport and logistics sector, has recently announced a significant milestone: processing over 10,000 insurance policies since its inception, with a 25% increase in policy volume over the past year. This growth underscores the escalating demand for comprehensive truck insurance solutions tailored to the unique needs of Australian freight operators. - read more

Envest Group Unveils TLI Underwriting: A New Era for Heavy Motor Fleet Insurance

07 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Envest Group, a prominent player in Australia's insurance sector, has announced the launch of TLI Underwriting, a new agency dedicated to providing specialized insurance solutions for heavy motor fleet operators. This strategic move aims to address the unique challenges faced by larger transport businesses in Australia. - read more

ASIC Initiates Legal Proceedings Against QBE for Alleged Misleading Discount Practices

07 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced legal action against QBE Insurance, alleging that the insurer misled more than 500,000 customers regarding premium discounts over a five-year period. This development has significant implications for the Australian insurance industry, particularly for policyholders seeking transparency and fairness in premium calculations. - read more

Declining Construction Insurance Premiums: A Boon for Australian Tradies

07 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

In 2025, Australia's construction insurance market has experienced a significant shift, with premiums decreasing across various lines due to intensified competition among insurers. This trend is particularly beneficial for tradespeople, commonly known as 'tradies,' who are witnessing more affordable coverage options. - read more

Upcoming Insurance Mandate: NSW Builders Must Act Before 2026 Deadline

07 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant regulatory development, registered building practitioners in New South Wales (NSW) are now required to secure professional indemnity (PI) insurance by July 1, 2026. This mandate, stemming from the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2021, underscores the importance of comprehensive risk management for tradies operating within the state. - read more

Click for more Insurance News