Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The dispute began when the owner's 2005 HSV Coupe GTO Z Series succumbed to flames in March of the previous year. RACQ Insurance accepted the total loss and initially valued the vehicle at $68,000.

However, the unsatisfied owner declined this offer, leading to an independent valuation which described the car as being in “good condition for its age and mileage” despite its 315,000km on the odometer.

Although comparable lower-mileage vehicles were advertised above $81,000, the heavy usage severely reduced its collectible appeal, the independent valuer noted. Conclusively, the evaluator deemed the insurer's offer reasonable.

The car owner contested this, alleging RACQ Insurance's assessment was flawed, particularly regarding the engine type and the car's rarity as one of only 60 manual transmission models, asserting its condition was excellent.

In response, RACQ revised their offer to $78,000 factoring in the vehicle's unique modifications and reconditioned engine, but the claimant stood firm in his refusal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), upon review, sided with the insurer. AFCA deemed RACQ Insurance's valuation and the independent assessment to be “logical, well-considered and helpful.”

According to Glass's Guide referenced by the AFCA, the vehicle's maximum estimated market value could not exceed $58,100, considering its age and mileage. Although rare, evidence was insufficient to justify a $200,000 evaluation.

The AFCA stated, “The complainant has not provided persuasive evidence to demonstrate the vehicle's worth is beyond what the insurer offered. Under such conditions, adjusting the settlement upward would not be justifiable.”

Reference: Original findings from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority's ruling were sourced from RACQ Insurance's appeal letter. Read more about the decision here.

Published:Wednesday, 24th Jul 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

ACCC Halts IAG's Bid to Acquire RAC WA's Insurance Division

21 May 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has recently opposed the proposed acquisition of RAC WA's insurance arm by Insurance Australia Group (IAG). This decision stems from concerns that the merger would significantly reduce competition within Western Australia's insurance sector, potentially leading to higher premiums and fewer options for consumers. - read more

Australian Health Insurance Premiums Experience Unprecedented Hikes

21 May 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent analyses have revealed that Australian health insurance premiums have surged by up to 25%, far exceeding the government-approved average increase of 4.41%. This substantial rise has raised concerns about the affordability and transparency of health insurance policies for consumers. - read more

Unprecedented Rise in Mental Health Claims Highlights Need for Prompt Super Fund Payouts

21 May 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia is experiencing an unprecedented surge in mental health-related Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) claims, prompting consumer advocates to call for superannuation funds to expedite insurance payouts for individuals affected by mental illness. - read more

HESTA Announces 12% Reduction in Insurance Fees for Members

19 May 2026: Paige Estritori

HESTA, a leading Australian superannuation fund, has unveiled a significant reduction in insurance fees, set to take effect from 1 July 2026. This initiative aims to make insurance coverage more accessible and affordable for its members, aligning with the fund's commitment to enhancing member benefits. - read more

AFCA Supports Insurer's Application of Offset Clause in Income Protection Case

19 May 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled in favour of Nippon Life Insurance in a dispute concerning the application of an offset clause in an income protection (IP) claim. This decision underscores the critical importance of policyholders understanding the specific terms and conditions of their insurance policies. - read more

Click for more Insurance News