Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall
Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
A car enthusiast's efforts to boost his insurance payout from $78,000 to $200,000 after his rare vehicle was destroyed by fire have been thwarted.
The dispute began when the owner's 2005 HSV Coupe GTO Z Series succumbed to flames in March of the previous year. RACQ Insurance accepted the total loss and initially valued the vehicle at $68,000.
However, the unsatisfied owner declined this offer, leading to an independent valuation which described the car as being in “good condition for its age and mileage” despite its 315,000km on the odometer.
Although comparable lower-mileage vehicles were advertised above $81,000, the heavy usage severely reduced its collectible appeal, the independent valuer noted. Conclusively, the evaluator deemed the insurer's offer reasonable.
The car owner contested this, alleging RACQ Insurance's assessment was flawed, particularly regarding the engine type and the car's rarity as one of only 60 manual transmission models, asserting its condition was excellent.
In response, RACQ revised their offer to $78,000 factoring in the vehicle's unique modifications and reconditioned engine, but the claimant stood firm in his refusal.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), upon review, sided with the insurer. AFCA deemed RACQ Insurance's valuation and the independent assessment to be “logical, well-considered and helpful.”
According to Glass's Guide referenced by the AFCA, the vehicle's maximum estimated market value could not exceed $58,100, considering its age and mileage. Although rare, evidence was insufficient to justify a $200,000 evaluation.
The AFCA stated, “The complainant has not provided persuasive evidence to demonstrate the vehicle's worth is beyond what the insurer offered. Under such conditions, adjusting the settlement upward would not be justifiable.”
Reference: Original findings from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority's ruling were sourced from RACQ Insurance's appeal letter. Read more about the decision here.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Recent analyses reveal a paradox within Australia's insurance sector: despite escalating premiums, insurers are experiencing a downturn in profits. This trend is largely attributed to the financial repercussions of extreme weather events and the subsequent surge in claims costs. - read more
The Australian insurance industry is currently grappling with an unprecedented surge in consumer complaints, primarily stemming from delays in processing everyday claims. Data from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) indicates that insurance companies are generating a record 100 complaints daily, as they struggle to manage routine claims efficiently. - read more
The Australian insurance landscape is characterized by a high degree of market concentration, with four major companies-Insurance Australia Group (IAG), Suncorp, QBE, and Allianz-controlling nearly 74% of the general insurance market. This dominance has raised questions about the level of competition within the industry and its implications for consumers. - read more
In a landmark move, the Australian Parliament has passed the Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Act 2025, effectively banning life insurers from using individuals' genetic test results in underwriting decisions. This legislation, which comes into effect on 8 October 2026, aims to eliminate potential discrimination based on genetic information and encourage Australians to undergo genetic testing without fear of insurance repercussions. - read more
The Life Insurance Code Compliance Committee (Life CCC) has released a report urging Australian life insurers to adopt fairer and more individualised approaches when assessing applications involving mental health disclosures. The report identifies a concerning trend where some insurers apply broad exclusions or outright denials based on mental health histories, rather than evaluating each applicant's unique circumstances. - read more
In recent years, we've seen a troubling rise in caravan thefts nationwide, which has undoubtedly caused concern within our vibrant community. It's clear that the adage 'better safe than sorry' has never been more applicable to caravan ownership. - read more
Embarking on a journey with your caravan is an incomparable experience, offering a unique blend of adventure, freedom, and the comfort of a home on wheels. However, it’s essential to recognize that just like any significant investment, your caravan needs to be protected. That's where choosing the right caravan insurance becomes not just a consideration, but a necessity. - read more
Caravan insurance is an important investment for anyone who owns a caravan, whether it's a touring caravan or a static caravan. Caravan insurance is designed to protect you financially in the event of theft, damage, or accidents. However, not all caravan insurance policies are created equal, and it's essential to choose the right policy to ensure you're adequately covered and get the best value for your money. - read more
The allure of the open road and the freedom to explore has never been more inviting, or more necessary, to do so responsibly. Sustainable caravanning offers a way to embrace the joys of adventure while ensuring that the natural landscapes we cherish remain unspoiled for future explorers. But what exactly is sustainable caravanning? Essentially, it is the practice of minimizing our environmental impact while enjoying life on the road. - read more
Knowledgebase
Policyholder: The individual or entity who owns the insurance policy.