Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The dispute began when the owner's 2005 HSV Coupe GTO Z Series succumbed to flames in March of the previous year. RACQ Insurance accepted the total loss and initially valued the vehicle at $68,000.

However, the unsatisfied owner declined this offer, leading to an independent valuation which described the car as being in “good condition for its age and mileage” despite its 315,000km on the odometer.

Although comparable lower-mileage vehicles were advertised above $81,000, the heavy usage severely reduced its collectible appeal, the independent valuer noted. Conclusively, the evaluator deemed the insurer's offer reasonable.

The car owner contested this, alleging RACQ Insurance's assessment was flawed, particularly regarding the engine type and the car's rarity as one of only 60 manual transmission models, asserting its condition was excellent.

In response, RACQ revised their offer to $78,000 factoring in the vehicle's unique modifications and reconditioned engine, but the claimant stood firm in his refusal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), upon review, sided with the insurer. AFCA deemed RACQ Insurance's valuation and the independent assessment to be “logical, well-considered and helpful.”

According to Glass's Guide referenced by the AFCA, the vehicle's maximum estimated market value could not exceed $58,100, considering its age and mileage. Although rare, evidence was insufficient to justify a $200,000 evaluation.

The AFCA stated, “The complainant has not provided persuasive evidence to demonstrate the vehicle's worth is beyond what the insurer offered. Under such conditions, adjusting the settlement upward would not be justifiable.”

Reference: Original findings from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority's ruling were sourced from RACQ Insurance's appeal letter. Read more about the decision here.

Published:Wednesday, 24th Jul 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Why APRA’s Latest Insurance Snapshot Matters for Clinics

31 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

APRA’s latest general insurance performance update points to a market that is in better shape than it was during the recent period of severe claims inflation, reinsurance pressure and weather-related volatility. For allied health practice owners, that is useful context, but it should not be read as a guarantee that every renewal will become cheaper or easier. - read more

What Renewed ESL Reform Debate Means for Fitness Operators

31 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Pressure for reform of NSW’s Emergency Services Levy is moving from an abstract insurance-sector issue to a practical cost question for fitness businesses. Recent industry coverage has again highlighted how levies and taxes added to insurance premiums can compound the affordability challenge for small operators, particularly when weather losses and rebuilding costs are already keeping commercial premiums elevated. - read more

What rising insurance complaints mean for consultant claims

31 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s latest insurance complaints data is a timely reminder that buying cover is only one part of risk management. The figures point to continuing pressure across general insurance, with disputes commonly linked to claim delays, declined claims, communication breakdowns and disagreements over how policy wording should apply. - read more

NSW Building Practitioners Enter a New Insurance Compliance Era

31 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

The commencement of New South Wales’ professional indemnity requirements for registered building practitioners marks a significant compliance shift for the state’s construction sector. From 1 July 2026, relevant practitioners must be indemnified under an insurance policy for work carried out in that capacity, bringing insurance evidence closer to the centre of day-to-day building compliance. - read more

What the Updated Broker Code Means for Insurance Clients

31 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

The National Insurance Brokers Association’s revised Insurance Brokers Code of Practice is moving the sector further towards clearer communication, stronger client care and more consistent professional standards. For Australians who rely on insurance brokers to navigate complex cover, the development is more than an industry housekeeping exercise. It goes directly to how clients understand advice, remuneration, service commitments and complaint pathways. - read more

Click for more Insurance News