Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.

Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.

AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.

The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.

Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.

The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.

“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.

Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.

For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.

Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Author: Paige Estritori
Sources

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

NSW Strata Reforms Strengthen Maintenance Compliance Enforcement

19 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The New South Wales (NSW) government has introduced a new tranche of strata reforms aimed at enhancing the maintenance and safety of apartment buildings across the state. A key component of these reforms is the proposal to grant NSW Fair Trading the authority to enter any apartment building without a warrant if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the owners corporation is failing to maintain common property adequately. - read more

CHU's 2025 Report Shows Stability in Strata Insurance Premiums Amid Climate and Regulatory Shifts

19 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

CHU, Australia's leading strata insurance underwriting agency, has released its 2025 State of the Strata Market report, providing a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the industry. The report offers valuable insights into premium movements, the impact of weather events, regulatory developments, and emerging risks affecting strata insurance. - read more

CHU Enhances Strata Insurance Capacity for Larger Developments

19 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In response to the evolving landscape of strata developments in Australia, CHU, the nation's leading strata insurance underwriting agency, has significantly increased its capacity to underwrite individual strata risks. The agency has raised its maximum single risk capacity to $690 million, a substantial rise from the previous limit of $300 million. This enhancement applies to CHU's strata insurance policies across both residential and commercial properties. - read more

Significant Rise in Australian Home Insurance Premiums

19 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian homeowners are facing substantial increases in home insurance premiums, with the average premium rising by 16% over the past year, according to a recent report by consumer advocacy group Choice. Notably, insurers such as Kogan, RAC, and Honey have implemented hikes exceeding 30%, placing additional financial strain on policyholders. - read more

APRA Highlights Evolving Trends in Australian Insurance Sectors

19 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released its quarterly aggregate statistics for the insurance sector, covering the period ending September 30, 2025. The data reveals notable shifts across general insurance, life insurance, and private health insurance sectors, reflecting the dynamic nature of the Australian insurance landscape. - read more

Click for more Insurance News