Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.

Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.

AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.

The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.

Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.

The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.

“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.

Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.

For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.

Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

What Renewed ESL Reform Debate Means for Fitness Operators

31 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Pressure for reform of NSW’s Emergency Services Levy is moving from an abstract insurance-sector issue to a practical cost question for fitness businesses. Recent industry coverage has again highlighted how levies and taxes added to insurance premiums can compound the affordability challenge for small operators, particularly when weather losses and rebuilding costs are already keeping commercial premiums elevated. - read more

What rising insurance complaints mean for consultant claims

31 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s latest insurance complaints data is a timely reminder that buying cover is only one part of risk management. The figures point to continuing pressure across general insurance, with disputes commonly linked to claim delays, declined claims, communication breakdowns and disagreements over how policy wording should apply. - read more

NSW Building Practitioners Enter a New Insurance Compliance Era

31 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

The commencement of New South Wales’ professional indemnity requirements for registered building practitioners marks a significant compliance shift for the state’s construction sector. From 1 July 2026, relevant practitioners must be indemnified under an insurance policy for work carried out in that capacity, bringing insurance evidence closer to the centre of day-to-day building compliance. - read more

What the Updated Broker Code Means for Insurance Clients

31 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

The National Insurance Brokers Association’s revised Insurance Brokers Code of Practice is moving the sector further towards clearer communication, stronger client care and more consistent professional standards. For Australians who rely on insurance brokers to navigate complex cover, the development is more than an industry housekeeping exercise. It goes directly to how clients understand advice, remuneration, service commitments and complaint pathways. - read more

What the Latest Truck Crash Findings Mean for Your Cover

30 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh heavy vehicle crash research from transport insurer NTI has again put a spotlight on the practical causes of serious truck incidents, with speed for the conditions, fatigue, distraction, equipment issues and vehicle fires all remaining central risk themes for Australian operators. For truck owners, fleet managers and owner-drivers, the findings are more than a safety update. They are a reminder that risk management and insurance outcomes are closely connected. - read more

Click for more Insurance News