Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.

In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.

The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.

Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.

The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.

AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.

"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.

"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."

"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.

Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Why Tradies Should Check Injury Cover Wording

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent Australian Financial Complaints Authority decision has put a sharp spotlight on a point many self-employed workers can easily overlook: the difference between being unable to work and being covered under the exact wording of an insurance policy. - read more

Longer Lives, Longer Illnesses: What It Means for Cover

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

New research from Zurich has put a fresh spotlight on a challenge many Australian households already feel in practical terms: living longer does not always mean living healthier. Its Chronic Care Index places Australia highly among OECD countries for overall health system performance, helped by strong healthcare capacity and relatively low mortality. But the same research points to a widening gap between lifespan and healthspan, with more people spending extended periods managing chronic illness. - read more

Volunteer H5 Training Sharpens Australia’s Biosecurity Watch

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

South Australia’s decision to train conservation volunteers in H5 bird flu detection marks a practical new phase in Australia’s biosecurity response. Rather than relying only on government officers and laboratory testing, the program aims to use experienced birdwatchers and conservation volunteers as an extra set of eyes across wetlands, coastlines and bird habitats. - read more

What the Steadfast takeover bid could mean for SMEs

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

A major ownership shake-up may be coming for one of the most influential names in Australian commercial insurance distribution, after global investment firm KKR joined the consortium pursuing Steadfast Group. The proposal, valued at about $7.7 billion, remains non-binding and is still subject to due diligence and further agreement, but it is significant because Steadfast sits behind a large network of insurance brokerages and underwriting agencies used by many Australian businesses. - read more

What a Renewed Flood Pool Debate Means for Retail Cover

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s flood insurance debate has returned to the foreground, with fresh attention on whether the existing Cyclone Reinsurance Pool should remain narrowly focused or whether a separate approach is needed for broader flood risk. For shop owners, the issue is more than a policy argument between governments and insurers. It goes directly to whether flood-prone businesses can obtain cover at a workable price, and whether current policies respond in the way owners expect when water damage disrupts trading. - read more

Click for more Insurance News