Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults
Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
Two farmhouses seeking insurance payouts for earthquake damage have had their claims denied, following a decision highlighting the role of pre-existing issues.
The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Renewed attention on strata governance in New South Wales is a timely reminder that insurance disclosure is now a front-line renewal issue for owners corporations, not a back-office formality. Following recent reforms aimed at improving transparency around strata management, commissions and third-party benefits, committees are under greater pressure to understand not only what cover they are buying, but how the placement has been arranged and paid for. - read more
The latest phase of New South Wales strata reform has brought strata insurance disclosure back into practical focus, moving the issue from policy debate to renewal-season reality for owners corporations. The changes are designed to make it clearer when a strata managing agent, broker, insurer or related party receives a commission, fee or other financial benefit connected with arranging insurance. - read more
Fresh life insurance performance data from APRA points to a market that is steadier than the disrupted conditions seen in recent years, but not one where employers can afford to be passive. For CFOs, HR leaders and directors, the message is less about a single quarterly result and more about the operating environment behind corporate life insurance pricing, claims service and product design. - read more
A fresh push to reform how NSW funds emergency services has put insurance affordability back in the spotlight, especially for small businesses that already feel every increase at renewal time. The issue centres on the Emergency Services Levy, which is applied through many insurance policies and has long been criticised by parts of the insurance sector as a disincentive to maintaining adequate cover. - read more
Australia’s tougher operational risk regime is sharpening the focus on how life insurers manage the systems, partners and processes that sit behind every policy. APRA’s CPS 230 standard requires regulated insurers to identify critical operations, set clear disruption tolerances and strengthen oversight of material service providers. For customers, this is not just a back-office compliance story. - read more
Maintaining your caravan isn't just about keeping it looking good; it's a crucial practice that ensures your safety on the road, as well as helping you protect your investment. A caravan represents a significant financial commitment, and just like any other vehicle, it requires regular care to maintain its value and functionality. - read more
The allure of the open road and the freedom to explore has never been more inviting, or more necessary, to do so responsibly. Sustainable caravanning offers a way to embrace the joys of adventure while ensuring that the natural landscapes we cherish remain unspoiled for future explorers. But what exactly is sustainable caravanning? Essentially, it is the practice of minimizing our environmental impact while enjoying life on the road. - read more
Caravan insurance is usually not a standalone legal requirement in Australia, but registration, CTP, towing liability and policy obligations can be easily confused. This guide explains how they differ and why many caravan owners still choose insurance for financial protection. - read more
In recent years, we've seen a troubling rise in caravan thefts nationwide, which has undoubtedly caused concern within our vibrant community. It's clear that the adage 'better safe than sorry' has never been more applicable to caravan ownership. - read more
Caravan insurance can protect against many road, theft, weather and liability risks, but every policy also has exclusions, limits and conditions. This guide explains common caravan insurance exclusions in Australia and the fine print owners should review before choosing or renewing cover. - read more
Knowledgebase
Copayment: A fixed amount you pay for a covered healthcare service, usually when you receive the service.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.