Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.

In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.

The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.

Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.

The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.

AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.

"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.

"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."

"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.

Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Severe Weather Risks Put Rental Property Insurance Back on the Agenda

18 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent insurance industry commentary on severe weather claims has reinforced a familiar message for Australian rental property owners: natural hazards are no longer occasional background risks. Storms, floods, bushfires and cyclones are increasingly shaping insurance affordability, availability and policy design, particularly in regions where exposure is already well understood by insurers. - read more

What insurance law reform means for life cover buyers

18 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

New Zealand's insurance law reforms are moving from policy debate into practical preparation, and life insurance customers should pay attention. The changes are designed to modernise old insurance rules, improve contract fairness and make the responsibilities of both insurers and consumers easier to understand. For households considering life, trauma, total and permanent disability or income protection cover, the key point is not that applications become less serious. It is that the process should become clearer and more proportionate. - read more

Why a Softer Job Market Should Prompt an Income Cover Check

18 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent business and labour market reporting has kept the spotlight on a softer jobs market, with many households paying closer attention to job security, hours of work and the strength of their emergency savings. For New Zealand workers, the financial question is not only whether employment conditions are changing. It is whether the household could keep functioning if income stopped for a reason outside their control. - read more

Why Climate Risk Is Back on the Truck Insurance Agenda

13 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

A fresh round of insurance industry warnings about climate exposure is a timely reminder for Australian truck operators that weather risk is no longer a background issue. Floods, bushfires, severe storms and prolonged road closures can affect far more than a single damaged vehicle. For owner-drivers and fleet managers, the larger concern is often the chain reaction: stranded equipment, missed delivery windows, cargo complications, depot damage and extended downtime while repair networks are under pressure. - read more

Affordability Pressure Puts Trade Cover Back Under the Spotlight

13 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh industry attention on insurance affordability is more than a household budget story. For Australian tradespeople, rising premiums, higher repair costs and uneven disaster exposure can flow directly into how clients fund work, how projects are scoped and how small trade businesses protect their own equipment, vehicles and liability risks. - read more

Click for more Insurance News