AFCA Rules in Favour of Owners in Lift Vandalism Dispute

3

The issue dates back to 2018 when the owners lodged a claim after multiple hydrants were deliberately opened, causing water damage to the lifts. Although the lift manufacturer and maintenance consultants recommended replacing the hoist ropes, Chubb’s assessor did not initially approve this part of the claim.

After a scope of work was agreed upon, the cables were placed on a "watchlist" due to anticipated further deterioration caused by water exposure. In 2019, consultants reiterated concerns of moisture-related damage, urging restoration to the lifts’ original state. Consequently, the replacement work for the hoist ropes was completed in 2020, with the owners claiming the expenses under the initial policy.

Chubb contested the claim, stating that "direct physical damage" from a "sudden and accidental" cause is required for policy application. They argued the cable damage resulted from insufficient lubrication and prolonged use, not the earlier vandalism.

According to Chubb, their appointed consultant found no concrete evidence of water causing damage to the main hoist ropes. However, AFCA’s ruling challenged this stance, citing inconsistencies in the maintenance records and earlier assessments acknowledging water exposure.

The AFCA panel expressed skepticism about Chubb’s theory of overuse leading to the cable damage, finding the insurer’s expert report unsubstantiated by technical or scientific testing. Instead, the ruling recognized the significant water event of 2018 as the probable cause, aligning with the insurable event criteria of the policy.

An AFCA ombudsman articulated doubt over Chubb's exclusions explaining the damage, remarking on the absence of convincing counter-evidence. As the conditions of policy exclusions were not sufficiently proven, AFCA concluded that the water event was the leading cause of damage, fulfilling the policy’s terms.

Published:Friday, 28th Mar 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

TAL Acquires 15.1% Stake in Challenger, Eyeing Retirement Sector Expansion 07 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori TAL, a prominent life insurance provider, has announced its acquisition of a 15.1% stake in Challenger Limited. This strategic move is seen as part of TAL's efforts to deepen its involvement in the annuities market, as it seeks to address the evolving needs of Australia's ageing demographic. - read more

Cyclone Pool to Address $1.7 Billion in Claims After Alfred's Impact 07 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori The destruction caused by Ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred is projected to demand approximately $1.7 billion in claims from the reinsurance pool, according to Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers. As the cyclone swept across Queensland on March 8, over 63,000 claims have already been lodged with insurers. The insurance coverage through the cyclone pool ceased 48 hours later, highlighting the widespread devastation in its wake. - read more

Insurers Assist Storm-Struck Casterton with Community Session 03 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) is set to host a community consultation and information session in Casterton, a town in Western Victoria recently battered by hail and storms. This event, scheduled for Wednesday, aims to provide residents with an opportunity to engage directly with their insurers. - read more

Insurance Council Urges Action on Risk Reduction as Election Approaches 02 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced a federal election set for May 3, positioning the Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) to leverage this political moment to advocate vigorously for enhanced risk reduction measures. The ICA is calling for substantial investment in mitigation strategies to address pressing issues of insurance affordability and resilience against natural disasters. - read more

Allianz and AWP Face Hefty Penalties for Misleading Insurance Claims 01 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori The Supreme Court of New South Wales has imposed significant criminal penalties on Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd and AWP Australia Pty Ltd. Allianz received a $13.5 million fine, while AWP was fined $3.3 million. These penalties were for falsely or misleadingly promoting financial products online, breaching sections 1041E(1) and 1311(1) of the Corporations Act 2001. - read more