AFCA Rules Against Engine Theft Coverage in Motor Policy Dispute

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The crux of the AFCA's ruling rested on the lack of evidence indicating the claimant's ownership of the engine, thereby negating any financial loss acknowledged under the policy. According to an AFCA ombudsman, even if ownership was established, the engine's status-intended but not installed-did not align with the policy’s definitions of 'vehicle' or 'modifications.'

Furthermore, the complainant had not opted for an additional policy benefit that could extend the cover to spare parts awaiting assembly into the insured vehicle. As a result, the claim for engine theft remains outside the current policy's provisions.

The insured also sought assistance from IAG to recover costs from the repairer, a request AFCA deemed inappropriate, emphasizing that issues pertaining to the repairer fell outside the scope of his insurance contract. This path remains a private matter between the claimant and the repairer involved.

This case highlights the critical importance for policyholders to thoroughly understand the intricacies and limitations of their insurance policies, particularly regarding coverage for vehicle components not yet integrated into the car. It demonstrates the necessity for explicit policy terms and the potential need for additional cover options to protect significant investments like spare parts.

The decision may prompt individual insurers and the wider insurance market to reassess coverage options related to spare parts and modifications to align with consumer expectations and reduce disputes. Policyholders are advised to consult their insurers to ensure adequate coverage, especially when dealing with valuable customizations or restorations. This incident serves as a valuable reminder to scrutinize insurance policies closely and engage with insurers proactively to clarify available coverage options.

Published:Sunday, 4th May 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Australian Senate Enacts Ban on Genetic Testing in Life Insurance Underwriting

17 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Senate has recently passed legislation that prohibits life insurers from using genetic test results in their underwriting processes. This landmark decision aims to protect consumers from potential genetic discrimination and ensure equitable access to life insurance coverage. - read more

AIA Australia Unveils New Member Insurance Portal for Enhanced User Experience

17 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

AIA Australia has recently launched a new member insurance portal, marking a significant advancement in digital services for policyholders. This initiative is part of the company's ongoing commitment to enhancing user experience and streamlining access to insurance information and services. - read more

Australian Life Insurers Achieve $279 Million Underwriting Gain in Q4 2025

17 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian life insurance industry has reported a substantial underwriting gain of $279 million for the fourth quarter of 2025, marking a significant improvement from the $36 million recorded in the same period the previous year. This data, released by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), highlights a notable turnaround in the sector's financial performance. - read more

Australian Life Insurers Under Review for Mental Health Disclosure Practices

17 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent findings from the Life Insurance Code Compliance Committee (Life CCC) have highlighted ongoing concerns regarding how Australian life insurers manage applications involving mental health disclosures. The committee's review indicates that while some insurers assess applicants individually, others continue to apply broad exclusions or rigid underwriting rules, potentially disadvantaging those with mental health histories. - read more

APRA and ASIC Review Life Insurance Premium Practices Amid Policyholder Concerns

17 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) have jointly reviewed life insurers' premium practices, focusing on the frequency and magnitude of premium increases. This initiative responds to policyholder concerns about unexpected and substantial premium hikes that may not align with initial policy terms or reasonable expectations. - read more

Click for more Insurance News