AFCA Rules Against Engine Theft Coverage in Motor Policy Dispute

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The crux of the AFCA's ruling rested on the lack of evidence indicating the claimant's ownership of the engine, thereby negating any financial loss acknowledged under the policy. According to an AFCA ombudsman, even if ownership was established, the engine's status—intended but not installed—did not align with the policy’s definitions of 'vehicle' or 'modifications.'

Furthermore, the complainant had not opted for an additional policy benefit that could extend the cover to spare parts awaiting assembly into the insured vehicle. As a result, the claim for engine theft remains outside the current policy's provisions.

The insured also sought assistance from IAG to recover costs from the repairer, a request AFCA deemed inappropriate, emphasizing that issues pertaining to the repairer fell outside the scope of his insurance contract. This path remains a private matter between the claimant and the repairer involved.

This case highlights the critical importance for policyholders to thoroughly understand the intricacies and limitations of their insurance policies, particularly regarding coverage for vehicle components not yet integrated into the car. It demonstrates the necessity for explicit policy terms and the potential need for additional cover options to protect significant investments like spare parts.

The decision may prompt individual insurers and the wider insurance market to reassess coverage options related to spare parts and modifications to align with consumer expectations and reduce disputes. Policyholders are advised to consult their insurers to ensure adequate coverage, especially when dealing with valuable customizations or restorations. This incident serves as a valuable reminder to scrutinize insurance policies closely and engage with insurers proactively to clarify available coverage options.

Published:Sunday, 4th May 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

NHVR Prohibition Notice Puts Fleet Systems Under the Insurance Microscope

12 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori

A fresh National Heavy Vehicle Regulator action against a heavy vehicle operator is a timely reminder that insurance risk is not limited to what happens at the moment of a crash. The NHVR announced on 30 October 2026 that it had issued a prohibition notice after identifying significant and ongoing safety risks, including repeated defects in safety-critical systems and concerns about the operator’s management controls. - read more

Diagnosis timing is not the only test for income cover

12 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent income protection dispute has put fresh attention on a difficult but important issue for Australian workers: a medical condition may be treated as pre-existing even where a formal diagnosis comes later. The case, reported on 9 November 2026, involved a prostate cancer claim that was declined after the Australian Financial Complaints Authority accepted that earlier medical warning signs and specialist investigations were enough to trigger a pre-existing condition exclusion. - read more

Fuel Recovery Order Restarts, Raising Insurance Budget Questions

12 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori

The Fair Work Commission’s varied fuel cost recovery order will restart obligations from 23 November 2026, requiring covered road transport contractual chains to account for higher fuel costs against the 6 March 2026 benchmark. For truck operators, the immediate issue is contract pricing, but the insurance angle is also important: cash flow, route choices, subcontracting arrangements and vehicle utilisation all influence how risk is presented and managed. - read more

Court Ruling Highlights Why TPD Wording Matters for Business Owners

12 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori

A Queensland Court of Appeal decision involving AIA Australia has put renewed attention on how technical policy conditions can affect total and permanent disability claims, and why business owners should not treat insurance wording as a background detail. The case concerned group TPD cover held through superannuation, but its broader message is relevant to SMEs that rely on life, TPD and disability-style cover to protect debt, ownership arrangements and business continuity. - read more

Latest Claims Data Shows Why Policy Structure Still Matters

12 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori

APRA’s latest life insurance claims and disputes statistics, released on 16 October 2026 and covering the 12 months to 30 June 2026, provide a useful reminder for Australian businesses: the practical value of cover often depends on how clearly it is structured, documented and understood before a claim ever arises. - read more

Click for more Insurance News