Policyholder Triumphs in Machinery Damage Dispute

0

The incident occurred in June 2017 when the glass handling machine tipped over while reversing. A representative from the involved business suggested that the machine's anti-crush functionality might have inadvertently been activated, causing it to lurch and topple under the load of a substantial glass sheet that measured 9.5 metres in height. Speed was also cited as a potential factor.

QBE, the insurer, initially rejected the claim based on assessments from the machine supplier's managing director and their own loss adjuster. These experts contended that the mishap was likely due to the glass panel being lifted off-centre and the boom being set too high during operation.

In contrast, the business's own glass specialist attributed the incident to operator error. Their argument highlighted the challenges in precisely aligning the lifting point with the panel's centre of gravity, particularly as it shifts when the machine rotates.

AFCA's ruling pointed out that, while the glass should normally be lifted at its centre of gravity, as per the machine's manual, the actual situation involved more complex dynamics. The authority found no definitive evidence that not adhering fully to these instructions directly led to the incident, and thus deemed the insurer's exclusion inapplicable. Furthermore, AFCA cast doubt on the supplier's MD's technical conclusions and his potential conflict of interest.

Ultimately, the decision underscores the importance of nuanced technical assessments in insurance disputes and calls for insurers to thoroughly investigate all claims aspects.

Looking forward, this ruling could influence future disputes where operational mishaps intersect with technical manual prescriptions, potentially prompting insurers to revisit their evaluation protocols and company guidance concerning machinery operation claims.

Published:Wednesday, 6th Aug 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Broker Ordered to Compensate Client for Uninsured Fire Losses 15 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori A recent ruling mandates an insurance broker to pay nearly $300,000 in compensation to a client after an insurer, QBE, declined a fire claim and cancelled the policy due to nondisclosures. The fire, which occurred in October 2022, severely damaged the commercial premises. QBE asserted that they would have denied coverage had they known about asbestos on the property, among other unreported issues. - read more

Insurance Claim Denied Due to Evidence of Multiple Collisions 14 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori An insurance dispute arose when a driver was refused coverage for car damage after evidence showed involvement in multiple collisions, contrary to her claim. Initially, the woman filed a claim with Hollard Insurance, stating her car had collided once with another vehicle. However, the situation took a turn when forensic data from in-car technology revealed two separate impacts occurring 11 minutes apart. - read more

ASIC Considers Action as Professional Indemnity Insurance Transparency Falls Short 12 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has voiced apprehension about the transparency of professional indemnity (PI) insurance amongst holders of the Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSLs). This concern arises from a recent market overview conducted to analyze PI insurance for AFSLs offering personal advice to retail clients. - read more

Traveller Triumphs in Insurance Dispute Over Unexpected Medical Detour 11 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori A savvy traveller has successfully challenged an insurance decision after having to make an impromptu stay in London due to a medical emergency. This came after the man needed urgent medical attention following a cat bite he sustained in Albania, which sent him to the UK capital for essential treatment. - read more

Revolutionising Life Insurance: Digital PMARs and Next-Gen Underwriting 11 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori In the age of instant digital services, where everything from basic necessities to luxury items can be delivered in a blink, the life insurance sector in Australia is poised for a transformative change. Historically plagued by lengthy processing times, the sector faces a persistent underinsurance gap, with over a million Australians lacking adequate life protection. The introduction of a digital Personal Medical Attendant Report (PMAR) by Acenda, formerly MLC Life, marks a significant stride towards addressing this challenge. - read more