Homeowner's Storm Damage Claim Denied; Faulty Construction Cited

0

However, a report from Lloyd’s Australia's forensic engineer countered this claim. It concluded that the rainfall levels were insufficient to have caused the reported damage. The engineer identified that the cracking in the rendering was a result of inadequate design provisions, which failed to mitigate stress accumulation due to volumetric changes in the wall.

Further analysis pointed to long-term water ingress issues, evidenced by the presence of efflorescence, a white mineral deposit. Additionally, water staining on the eaves aligned with findings of blocked downpipes and gutters, indicating maintenance neglect, rather than storm impact.

This case underscores the importance of regular property maintenance and thorough construction inspections before insurance claims. The findings demonstrate how insurers can leverage detailed assessments to differentiate between damage caused by natural events and that caused by other factors like neglect or poor construction practices. Therefore, it holds significant implications for both homeowners and the insurance industry regarding the conditions under which claims are assessed and potentially denied.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer's decision, emphasising the engineer’s plausible explanations and the historical nature of the damage. The ruling highlights the insurer's right to refuse claims when lack of maintenance contributes to the damage. This decision may prompt other homeowners to reassess and enhance their maintenance routines to ensure coverage in genuine storm damage scenarios. Moving forward, it will be crucial for homeowners to maintain comprehensive records of property upkeep and for insurers to continue refining their assessment protocols to ensure just claim evaluations.

Published:Thursday, 24th Jul 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AFCA Rejects Traveller's Insurer Claim for Alternative Flight Costs 25 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori An Australian travel insurance policyholder faced disappointment as the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) denied their claim for reimbursement of costs incurred due to changing travel plans amid threats of a pilot strike. The traveller, who rearranged his flights from Sydney to Vancouver and subsequently to Toronto, had hoped his insurer, AIG Australia, would cover the $5,576 expenses for the rebooked flights and additional accommodation. - read more

Fee Models Emerge as Solution to Cyclone Insurance Affordability Concerns 25 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The affordability of cyclone insurance in Australia’s high-risk zones remains a pressing issue, prompting some brokers to shift towards fee-based models. This change is highlighted in the latest annual review of the cyclone reinsurance pool from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). - read more

Homeowner's Storm Damage Claim Denied; Faulty Construction Cited 24 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori A homeowner's attempt to secure a storm damage insurance payout has been thwarted after an investigation revealed that the damage was due to poor maintenance and faulty construction, rather than extreme weather conditions. The initial claim attributed the damage on the property's western wall and roof eaves to significant rainfall, citing a substantial 141mm in July, with a notable record of 43.6mm in a single day. - read more

NSW Workers’ Compensation Scheme Faces Major Overhaul Amid Underinsurance Issues 23 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The New South Wales State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA) has identified critical issues of underinsurance and employer non-compliance within the icare workers’ compensation scheme. A recent review highlighted that over $60 million in premiums were not collected due to missing wage declarations, with about 75% of employers audited showing non-compliance responsible for an additional $24.5 million in unpaid premiums. - read more

Insurer Prevails in Vehicle Value Dispute 23 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori In a recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), a protest from a car owner against her insurer, RAC Insurance, regarding the reduction of her vehicle's agreed value has been dismissed. The case arose after the complainant made a total loss claim following an accident in October, only to discover that her vehicle's value had been adjusted down to $29,700 from a previous total of $40,000. - read more