AFCA Rejects Traveller's Insurer Claim for Alternative Flight Costs

0

Initially scheduled to fly on September 18, the policyholder was informed of possible disruptions due to a planned strike. Although the airline assured him that service would continue as normal unless the strike impacted schedules starting September 15, the traveller chose to fly out two days earlier to avoid potential cancellations. Believing this decision would be covered, he contacted AIG before lodging his claim. However, AIG clarified its policy only covers additional expenses if a traveller is stranded or misses a connection—circumstances the traveller did not encounter.

This ruling highlights the need for consumers to thoroughly understand the terms of their travel insurance policies, especially regarding what constitutes a "covered event." In this case, the traveller acted out of precaution, but without a qualifying event under the policy definitions, the insurer was under no obligation to compensate for the traveller’s proactive change. This case sets a precedent for how claims will be interpreted when travel disruptions are anticipated but do not ultimately occur.

Travel insurers and policyholders alike should take heed of this decision. It's crucial for insurers to ensure their policy terms are clearly communicated, reducing the potential for misunderstandings such as this. Meanwhile, consumers are advised to review their policies in detail before trips and engage with their insurers for clarifications about coverage scopes. As AFCA continues to deal with rising disputes, especially in the travel sector, this case underscores the need for both clarity and caution when planning trips amidst unguaranteed travel uncertainties.

Published:Friday, 25th Jul 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AFCA Rejects Traveller's Insurer Claim for Alternative Flight Costs 25 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori An Australian travel insurance policyholder faced disappointment as the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) denied their claim for reimbursement of costs incurred due to changing travel plans amid threats of a pilot strike. The traveller, who rearranged his flights from Sydney to Vancouver and subsequently to Toronto, had hoped his insurer, AIG Australia, would cover the $5,576 expenses for the rebooked flights and additional accommodation. - read more

Fee Models Emerge as Solution to Cyclone Insurance Affordability Concerns 25 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The affordability of cyclone insurance in Australia’s high-risk zones remains a pressing issue, prompting some brokers to shift towards fee-based models. This change is highlighted in the latest annual review of the cyclone reinsurance pool from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). - read more

Homeowner's Storm Damage Claim Denied; Faulty Construction Cited 24 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori A homeowner's attempt to secure a storm damage insurance payout has been thwarted after an investigation revealed that the damage was due to poor maintenance and faulty construction, rather than extreme weather conditions. The initial claim attributed the damage on the property's western wall and roof eaves to significant rainfall, citing a substantial 141mm in July, with a notable record of 43.6mm in a single day. - read more

NSW Workers’ Compensation Scheme Faces Major Overhaul Amid Underinsurance Issues 23 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The New South Wales State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA) has identified critical issues of underinsurance and employer non-compliance within the icare workers’ compensation scheme. A recent review highlighted that over $60 million in premiums were not collected due to missing wage declarations, with about 75% of employers audited showing non-compliance responsible for an additional $24.5 million in unpaid premiums. - read more

Insurer Prevails in Vehicle Value Dispute 23 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori In a recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), a protest from a car owner against her insurer, RAC Insurance, regarding the reduction of her vehicle's agreed value has been dismissed. The case arose after the complainant made a total loss claim following an accident in October, only to discover that her vehicle's value had been adjusted down to $29,700 from a previous total of $40,000. - read more